Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)

Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)

Share this post

Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
Why King David's Sin and Restoration Story Can't Be Applied to Fallen Pastors

Why King David's Sin and Restoration Story Can't Be Applied to Fallen Pastors

Give the Gift of The Scary Truth About Christmas: Separating Fact from Fiction in Holiday Traditions

Tov Rose's avatar
Tov Rose
Dec 27, 2024
∙ Paid
4

Share this post

Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
Why King David's Sin and Restoration Story Can't Be Applied to Fallen Pastors
Share

Christian Leaders caught in sin often immediately claim King David as the prototype for restoration. Frankly, I find that sick and disturbing. Here is why:

King David's story with Bathsheba, as detailed in 2 Samuel 11-12, illustrates a narrative of sin, judgment, and the consequences that followed. David, seduced Bathsheba, committed adultery and then orchestrated the death of her husband, Uriah, to cover his sin. This act of deceit and murder led to judgment pronounced by both David, and the prophet Nathan.

Nathan approached David with a parable about a rich man who, instead of taking from his own flock, took the poor man's only lamb. Outraged, David declared that the rich man should die and repay fourfold (24 times). Nathan then revealed that David was the rich man in the story, pronouncing God's judgment:

1. The sword would never depart from his house, implying continual conflict.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tov Rose
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share