Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)

Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)

Share this post

Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
When Ancient Jewish Scholars and Ancient New Testament Writers Agree, What Should WE Conclude?

When Ancient Jewish Scholars and Ancient New Testament Writers Agree, What Should WE Conclude?

Tov Rose
Sep 11, 2017
∙ Paid

Share this post

Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
Tov Rose (The Happy Theologist)
When Ancient Jewish Scholars and Ancient New Testament Writers Agree, What Should WE Conclude?
Share

The concept of God having a Son is enshrined in the Hebrew Masoretic Text. There are two spelling for the Divine Name, 1) Yehovah, 2) Yehoveeh.The spelling Yehovah, in the Masoretic text represents the more ancient concept predating the Masoretes, of Gods Son and Regent, his Voice that speaks to creation, which John calls, The Word. PAUL calls him the Creator God in 1 Corinthians, Colossians and Hebrews calls Him creator and God.

The other Divine Name spelling represents Father God, who in ancient Hebrew tradition was an unseen Spirit that never directly interacted with Humanity, but allowed the signs and wonders and speaking to be done by The Word (Yehovah). Yehovah was also physically seen 44 times, not his Daddy.

Jesus picks up this theme and confirmed its truth when he said, No man has seen the Father except the Son of Man...(speaking of Himself in Divine Terms as the Son of God from Daniel,   on a throne beside the Father in Heaven).

THOSE WHO SAY Jesus is not also God, You need to …

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tov Rose
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share